What type of deduction applies for insufficient extension on glides?

The correct answer pertains specifically to the type of deduction applied when a gymnast demonstrates insufficient extension on glides. In gymnastics judging, deductions for specific execution flaws can vary in how they are categorized and how they are quantified.

For insufficient extension on glides, the rule states that the deduction can range up to 0.10, which reflects a nuanced approach to how judges interpret the execution quality. This indicates that while the extension may not have been completely satisfactory, it was not severe enough to warrant a flat or scalar deduction, which might apply to more significant errors.

Understanding this context clarifies why the correct choice focuses specifically on the maximum deduction of 0.10 for insufficient extension rather than suggesting a broader category of deductions that could apply in different scenarios. The maximum indicates the potential severity of the issue while still allowing for a degree of subjective judgment in each individual performance.