What is the type of score reflection necessary when using a 4-panel judge system?

In a 4-panel judge system, the scoring process typically involves taking into account the scores provided by each judge to ensure a fair and accurate result. The correct method in this context is to average the last two scores given by the judges. This approach helps to mitigate the influence of any outlier scores that may not represent the gymnast's true performance, thus providing a more balanced reflection of the routine.

By averaging the last two scores, the system also allows for a consensus among the judges while still considering diverse perspectives within the judging panel. Each judge may have different criteria for evaluation, and focusing on the last two scores can help consolidate their perspectives while reducing the impact of any excessively high or low marks that could skew the final outcome.

This method contrasts with other options where all scores are added or only specific scores are factored in, which might not adequately reflect the gymnast's performance due to the various biases inherent in individual judging.